🤲Da'wah & State of the Ummah
The jurisprudence of disagreement and its impact on eliminating terrorism
فقه الخلاف وأثره في القضاء على الإرهاب
Author: د. يوسف بن عبد الله الشبيلي
About this work
يتناول كتاب فقه الخلاف وأثره في القضاء على الإرهاب للدكتور يوسف الشبيلي موضوع فقه الخلاف وأهميته في تجنب الانحراف الفكري والتطرف، مستعرضاً قواعد الخلاف المستنبطة من نصوص الشريحة وأقوال العلماء، ويهدف إلى توضيح كيفية التعامل مع الاختلافات الفقهية بحكمة واعتدال، مع التركيز على كيفية مواجهة ظاهرة الإرهاب من خلال فهم صحيح للفقه الإسلامي وآدابه.
Translation
The book Jurisprudence of Disagreement and its Impact on Eliminating Terrorism by Dr. Youssef Al-Shubaili deals with the subject of Jurisprudence of Disagreement and its importance in avoiding intellectual deviation and extremism, reviewing the rules of disagreement deduced from the texts of the slide and the sayings of scholars, and aims to clarify how to deal with jurisprudential differences with wisdom and moderation, with a focus on how to confront the phenomenon of terrorism through a correct understanding of Islamic jurisprudence and its etiquette.
Topics covered
- introduction
- An introduction to the meaning of disagreement
- The first type is reprehensible disagreement
- The second type is praiseworthy difference
- The second rule: Separation is a universal Sunnah and paying it is a legal obligation
- The third rule: Truth is accepted from wherever it comes
- The fourth rule is that people’s statements must be presented to Sharia law
- The sixth rule is the difference between absolute rule and specific rule
- The tenth rule: Difference of opinion does not spoil the friendliness of an issue
- Conclusion and recommendations
- the reviewer
Next →
فقه الدعوة الإسلامية في الغرب ووجوب تجديدها