XAD
🔍
← Back to category

⚖️Legal Theory & Maxims (Usul al-Fiqh)

The ultimate goal of explaining the essence of assets

غاية الوصول في شرح لب الأصول

Author: زكريا بن محمد بن أحمد بن زكريا الأنصاري، زين الدين أبو يحيى السنيكي (المتوفى: 926هـ) (d. 926)

About this work

هذا الكتاب هو شرح لكتاب مختصر "لب الأصول" لمؤلفه زكريا الأنصاري، ويهدف إلى توضيح مفاهيم الأصول الفقهية وقواعد الاستنباط. يتناول الكتاب مواضيع متعددة في أصول الفقه مثل الواجبات والمحرمات والمطلق والمقيد، معتمداً في شرحه على عبارات شيخه العلامة المحلي لسلاستها وحسن تأليفها. يسعى المؤلف إلى تبسيط المعاني وشرح اللفظ الصعب لتسهيل فهم القواعد الفقهية وتطبيقها في حياة المسلم.

Translation

This book is an explanation of the brief book “Lubb Al-Usul” by Zakaria Al-Ansari, and aims to clarify the concepts of jurisprudential principles and the rules of deduction. The book deals with multiple topics in the principles of jurisprudence, such as duties, prohibitions, absolutes, and restrictions, relying in its explanation on the expressions of his sheikh, the scholar Al-Mahli, for their clarity and good writing. The author seeks to simplify the meanings and explain the difficult pronunciation to facilitate understanding the jurisprudential rules and their application in the life of a Muslim.

Topics covered

  • introduction
  • Introductions
  • A question is to prove a subjective presentation of the subject
  • A question regarding the forbidden duty of those who have two choices
  • The issue of imposing sufficiency
  • issue
  • Absolute matter
  • operative and understood
  • A matter of kindness
  • The chosen issue is that languages ​​are suspended
  • The issue of pronunciation and meaning
  • Derivation issue
  • The more correct issue is that the synonym is a reality
  • The more correct issue is that the joint is a reality
  • The question of Arabization
  • The issue of pronunciation is either real or metaphorical
  • The question of whether the word is used in its true meaning
  • The letters
  • The command
  • The more correct issue is that the “do” form is specific to the psychological matter
  • The more correct question is to seek essence
  • The more correct issue is that the matter does not require a judiciary
  • The issue of the chosen one: The psychological matter is defined as a certain thing, not a prohibition against its opposite
  • The issue of the two matters if they are not consecutive
  • The issue of prohibition requires refraining from doing something

Next →

غمز عيون البصائر في شرح الأشباه والنظائر